NEW UMASS AMHERST LABOR CENTER STUDY FINDS NEARLY 10% OF RHODE ISLAND EMPLOYERS MISCLASSIFY WORKERS, COSTING TAXPAYERS TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

February 14, 2022

Working paper co-produced by the Institute for Construction Economic Research finds costs to taxpayers may be as high as $54 million

AMHERST, Mass. – A new study released today by the University of Massachusetts Amherst Labor Center reveals that nearly 1-in-10 Rhode Island employers misclassified employees as independent contractors between 2016 and 2021, affecting an estimated 19,359 workers in the state in 2019 and costing taxpayers at least $25.1 million. Illegal misclassification allows firms to evade taxes while denying workers their legal rights to, among other things, unemployment insurance benefits, workers’ compensation insurance and overtime pay.

The study, which was co-produced by the Institute for Construction Economics Research (ICERES) and conducted by Tom Juravich, professor of labor studies and sociology at UMass Amherst, and Russell Ormiston, associate professor of business and economics at Allegheny College and president of the ICERES, relied on extensive data provided by the Rhode Island Department of Labor and Training.

“This research builds on the work we did in Massachusetts and shows that rampant worker misclassification and employer tax fraud is a problem across New England,” says Juravich.

Worker misclassification occurs in every industry of the Rhode Island economy, but is especially rampant among residential construction, janitorial services, landscapers and certain types of construction contractors, such as painting and finish carpentry.

“The illegal misclassification of workers as independent contractors in residential construction has created a hothouse for wage theft,” Juravich says.

(Read More)

(PDF Copy of Study)

Prevailing Wage Laws: What Do We Know?

Institute for Construction Economics Research (ICERES)

In recent years, states and municipalities have been increasingly engaged in heated, often partisan, debates over the future of prevailing wage laws. In addition to the repeal of state prevailing wage laws in West Virginia and Kentucky, there have been high-profile political challenges in several states including Wisconsin and Nevada. Numerous city councils and county commissioners have been concurrently engaged in similar debates regarding local prevailing wage ordinances. References to economic studies often accompany these calls for legislative action, as advocates on both sides of the debate can point to papers supporting their position. The lack of consensus among researchers, however, is mostly attributable to differences in empirical methodology and scientific rigor. To improve the clarity of future public policy debates on prevailing wage laws, this paper summarizes the current state of research on these policies, highlighting recent academic findings and identifying empirical shortcomings inherent in a number of oft-cited non-academic studies.

(See full PDF of Study here)