Responsible Bidder Requirements OK’d (NJ)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Vince Conti
Nov 9, 2019

COURT HOUSE – Long ordinance drafts filled with legal language and dealing with issues of contract performance do not generally gain the attention of many citizens, even though they may provide important protections for the taxpayer.

That was the case Nov. 4, when Middle Township Committee held the second reading and public hearing on an ordinance that establishes “responsible bidder” requirements for municipal contracts. No one spoke at the hearing, and the ordinance was adopted unanimously.

The bidder requirements protect the municipality from situations where it might have been required to accept a low bid on a contact from a firm that could not satisfactorily complete the contract.

The ordinance lays out bidder requirements that speak to a potential contractor’s compliance with federal, state, and county laws, adequate insurance coverage, satisfactory past performance, a record of conformity with environmental and other laws, skilled workforce levels, and other factors.

Having the ordinance in place lessens the chance that a municipal action to justifiably bypass a low bid would be overturned in court.

(See Article)

2019 Budget Fails to Close the “Public Works” Loophole (NY)

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

Opponents of commonsense reform mislead with false cost figures

For Immediate Release
April 1, 2019

Last night, state leaders reached a budget agreement for fiscal year 2019 which unfortunately fails to include the proper definition of public works. Properly defining public works is a commonsense reform to apply anti-corruption protections and family-supporting prevailing wages to all construction projects which receive public assistance.

To protect taxpayers from wasteful spending and corruption, New York requires competitive and transparent public bidding by contractors on all public works construction projects. Unfortunately, a loophole in state law allows millions of taxpayer dollars to be spent without the anti-corruption and transparency demanded of traditional public work projects. Increasingly, economic development projects across the state fall through this loophole, allowing public money to bypass these safeguards as it goes to private interests. Closing the loophole by properly defining public work to include all projects supported with public money will provide much needed accountability and transparency in government spending.

The measure’s opponents successfully muddied the water by spreading misinformation to suggest it would result in “huge” increases in construction project costs. The truth is that defining public works would reward workers and taxpayers, not the wealthy and irresponsible contractors exploiting our flawed system. As per economists Frank Manzo, Alex Lantsberg, and Kevin Duncan, “the overwhelming majority of peer-reviewed research conducted over the last 15 years forms the consensus view that construction costs are not affected by prevailing wages.” Sixteen other states across the country apply a more comprehensive definition of public work, which apply middle-class prevailing wages. Unsurprisingly, the doomsday scenario of huge cost increases and less development, which opponents claim would befall New York, has not materialized in these other states.

While today’s state budget was a missed opportunity, the New York Foundation for Fair Contracting looks forward to when all taxpayer-funded construction goes to the lowest responsible bidders, not the most politically well-connected contractors. The NYFFC is a non-profit established to level the playing field in public works construction for the benefit of taxpayers, responsible contractors, and workers.

(Read More)

San Jose, Calif., Weighs Boost for Construction Project Workers

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Joyce E. Cutler
March 27, 2018

Private construction projects in San Jose, Calif., that receive $3 million or more in tax breaks or other public financial support would have to pay prevailing wages and hire local workers under a proposal the city council is expected to consider next week.

“There are three basic challenges we’re trying to grapple with. One is a severe shortage of affordable housing and of housing supply generally; substantial shortage of construction labor, which are driving up construction costs; and third, a growing gap between those who are benefiting from the great prosperity here in the Bay Area and those who are gasping for air with the rising tide,” Liccardo said.

Local Standards

The proposal would require that employers on the projects pay a wage-and-benefits package that’s at least equivalent to the state-determined levels for the work and geographic area. At least 30 percent of the workers on a qualifying project within the city would have to live within 50 miles of the job site. A quarter of apprentice hours would have to go to disadvantaged workers. Projects would have monitoring and compliance provisions.

The requirements would cover projects that receive at least $3 million in public subsidies, including money, land, or other direct financial assistance or a substantial reduction in fees or taxes.

“The end goal is to provide good quality jobs to local workers. And whether we do that by way of initiative or reaching a compromise by the more conventional channels is not so important to us,” Ben Field, South Bay Labor Council executive officer, told Bloomberg Law.

Union-Backed Initiative

The agreement was reached after negotiations with the South Bay Labor Council, Working Partnerships USA, the Santa Clara-San Benito Counties Building Trades, and the Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing, and Sprinkler Fitters (MEPS) unions, Liccardo said in a memo to the council.

“One of the best ways to ensure that good quality jobs go to local workers is to provide a prevailing wage,” Field said March 23. “One of the basic problems that we’re seeing here is middle class jobs are disappearing. A large part of the reason is the construction workforce is not being paid adequately.” Would-be construction workers aren’t going into trades or crafts where the wages are depressed.

(Read More)

Lake County commissioners OK updated responsible contractor checklist

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Andrew Cass, The News-Herald
POSTED: 04/30/18, 3:22 PM EDT

A sizable group of labor union representatives packed into the Lake County commissioners’ chambers to show support for a resolution updating the county’s responsible contractor checklist for infrastructure projects

Commissioner John Hamercheck said the resolution was part of a yearlong process, gaining steam in the past three months. It passed unanimously at the board’s most recent meeting.

“It sets the rules for how we’re going to do capital improvements at the county level,” Commissioner Daniel P. Troy said.

Troy also said he thinks that it ensures that the taxpayers – who are paying for the projects, be it through federal, state or local funds – are getting the best return on their investment.

“The way I look at it, it’s putting this in place so we’re not sitting here trying to determine who is the lowest bidder and who is the best bidder,” he said. “It’s still the law, but sometimes that becomes very difficult.”

Basically, he added, they’re setting criteria that is going to help ensure they pay “the right people the right amount of money to do the job the right way the first time.”

“What we’re looking for in this responsible contract language is furnishing of records as to that contractor’s performance on other projects, how they have complied with statutes that we have to comply with in terms of prevailing wage, payments of benefits etc.,” he said.

(Read More)

City of Cincinnati, labor group win key lawsuit over contracting

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Chris Wetterich
Jan 5, 2018, 2:57pm

Under federal law, it is OK for the city of Cincinnati to require bidders on contracts to have apprenticeship programs and health and retirement plans, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has ruled, a major victory for Cincinnati City Council Democrats and the Laborers International Union, which pushed for the requirements.

The so-called “responsible bidder” ordinance has been the subject of lawsuits and long-running disputes between council’s progressive and conservative members since it was enacted in 2013.

…

In the case, Allied sued the city. A U.S. District Court judge ruled against the city but was reversed on appeal.

(Read More)

City of Berkeley Enacts First of Its Kind Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

By Valerie Gotten – Jul 20, 2016

BERKELEY, Calif. /California Newswire/ – Last night, the City of Berkeley approved a first-of-its-kind local ordinance aimed at preventing wage theft on local construction projects, Smart Cities Prevail announced today.

Authored by Councilmember Laurie Capitelli, co-sponsored by a majority of the Council and supported by construction industry trade associations and workers’ rights groups, the measure requires that developers and builders certify that all contractors performing work on large projects have complied with state wage and hour laws as a condition of winning a certificate of occupancy from the city.

“Enforcing wage laws is especially difficult in the construction industry, because unscrupulous contractors who cheat workers in order to win bids on large projects find ways of disappearing after the work is done,” said Smart Cities Prevail Policy Director Scott Littlehale. “By expanding transparency and accountability BEFORE a project is complete, Berkeley has taken an important step towards preventing wage theft and leveling the playing field for honest construction businesses competing for this work.”

(Read More)

Building Trades Unions Combine Efforts to Pass Responsible Contractor Legislation

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

When it comes to public construction projects in Minnesota, the law says that the lowest responsible bidder gets the job. What constitutes a “responsible bidder” wasn’t clearly defined in the law, however.

Too often, unscrupulous contractors skirt the law to win bids on taxpayer-funded projects. During the recent legislative session, the unions of the Minnesota Building & Construction Trades spearheaded an effort to rectify this, culminating in passage of a bill establishing criteria that contractors must meet when they submit bids to state or local governments.

A bi-partisan effort, with authors from both the Democrats and Republicans, the bill passed the House 84-38 and the Senate 59-0 and was signed into law by Governor Mark Dayton.

“The Trades were frustrated that unscrupulous bidders were being awarded public contracts on all sorts of jobs,” said Kyle Makarios, director of Government Affairs for the Regional Council of Carpenters and leader of the lobbying effort. “We put our heads together to come up with a mechanism to fix the problem.

Stalemate at Metropolitan Sewer District – Ohio

Posted by National Alliance for Fair Contracting on

At $3.2 billion and an estimated 15- to 20-year time frame for completion, Cincinnati’s project to retrofit and replace its sewers is one of the most expansive in the city’s history. But the sewer project, which is part of a mandate from the federal government, is now facing major hurdles as the city and county dispute how contracts for the project should be awarded and whether the government should be more involved in dictating how contractors train their employees.

Most recently, the Hamilton County Board of Commissioners put an unprecedented funding hold on all sewer projects until Cincinnati changes its “responsible bidder” law, which City Council unanimously passed in June 2012 and modified in May this year.

(Read More)